Current:Home > MarketsTexas Supreme Court rejects attempt to stop law banning gender-affirming care for most minors -WealthEngine
Texas Supreme Court rejects attempt to stop law banning gender-affirming care for most minors
View
Date:2025-04-13 02:44:40
The Texas Supreme Court on Thursday denied a motion to stop a new law that will ban gender-affirming care for most minors.
The law, passed by the Republican-led Texas state legislature earlier this year, is set to go into effect on Friday.
A group of families and physicians filed a lawsuit earlier this summer to block the measure. Last week, a district court stopped the law from going into effect, arguing it violated the rights of transgender children. The Texas attorney general's office appealed to the state Supreme Court, which is composed entirely of Republicans.
The bill, known as SB14, would prevent transgender minors from accessing hormone therapies, puberty blockers and transition surgeries. Children and teens who are already accessing treatments would be "weaned off" in a "medically appropriate" manner, according to CBS Texas.
Medical experts have said gender-affirming surgical procedures are rarely performed on children.
In the lawsuit, the plaintiffs argued that "transgender adolescents in Texas are now faced with the loss of access to safe, effective, and medically necessary treatment, and their parents are faced with the loss of their ability to direct their children's medical treatment."
The state Supreme Court did not offer an explanation for its decision.
Texas is one of more than 20 states that have recently adopted laws to ban gender-affirming care, although not all have gone into effect, according to The Associated Press. Texas is the most populous state among those enacting such bans.
- In:
- Texas
veryGood! (3)
Related
- The Louvre will be renovated and the 'Mona Lisa' will have her own room
- Charges tied to China weigh on GM in Q4, but profit and revenue top expectations
- Could your smelly farts help science?
- A White House order claims to end 'censorship.' What does that mean?
- San Francisco names street for Associated Press photographer who captured the iconic Iwo Jima photo
- Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
- The company planning a successor to Concorde makes its first supersonic test
- Former Danish minister for Greenland discusses Trump's push to acquire island
- Are Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp down? Meta says most issues resolved after outages
- The company planning a successor to Concorde makes its first supersonic test
Ranking
- B.A. Parker is learning the banjo
- Trump's 'stop
- South Korea's acting president moves to reassure allies, calm markets after Yoon impeachment
- EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
- Retirement planning: 3 crucial moves everyone should make before 2025
- Juan Soto praise of Mets' future a tough sight for Yankees, but World Series goal remains
- The city of Chicago is ordered to pay nearly $80M for a police chase that killed a 10
- Rams vs. 49ers highlights: LA wins rainy defensive struggle in key divisional game
Recommendation
New Mexico governor seeks funding to recycle fracking water, expand preschool, treat mental health
Louvre will undergo expansion and restoration project, Macron says
Warm inflation data keep S&P 500, Dow, Nasdaq under wraps before Fed meeting next week
Military service academies see drop in reported sexual assaults after alarming surge
Whoopi Goldberg is delightfully vile as Miss Hannigan in ‘Annie’ stage return
IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
A White House order claims to end 'censorship.' What does that mean?
DeepSeek: Did a little known Chinese startup cause a 'Sputnik moment' for AI?