Current:Home > reviewsFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -WealthEngine
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
View
Date:2025-04-14 19:14:39
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (5)
Related
- Travis Hunter, the 2
- Rihanna Transforms Into Blonde Bombshell With New Hair Look
- They got pregnant with 'Ozempic babies' and quit the drug cold turkey. Then came the side effects.
- What's the mood in Iran as Israel mulls its response?
- California DMV apologizes for license plate that some say mocks Oct. 7 attack on Israel
- Dubai flooding hobbles major airport's operations as historic weather event brings torrential rains to UAE
- Most student loan borrowers have delayed major life events due to debt, recent poll says
- See Josh Hartnett Play Serial Killer Dad in Chilling Trap Movie Trailer Amid His Hollywood Return
- New data highlights 'achievement gap' for students in the US
- Meta’s newest AI model beats some peers. But its amped-up AI agents are confusing Facebook users
Ranking
- Mets have visions of grandeur, and a dynasty, with Juan Soto as major catalyst
- Dickey Betts reflects on writing ‘Ramblin' Man’ and more The Allman Brothers Band hits
- Alabama court authorizes executing a man convicted of killing a delivery driver
- Dickey Betts reflects on writing ‘Ramblin' Man’ and more The Allman Brothers Band hits
- McKinsey to pay $650 million after advising opioid maker on how to 'turbocharge' sales
- Sweeping gun legislation approved by Maine lawmakers following Lewiston mass shooting
- U.K. lawmakers back anti-smoking bill, moving step closer to a future ban on all tobacco sales
- Zack Snyder's 'Rebel Moon' is back in 'Part 2': What kind of mark will 'Scargiver' leave?
Recommendation
Arkansas State Police probe death of woman found after officer
Unfair labor complaint filed against Notre Dame over athletes
Jared Goff calls Detroit new home, says city can relate to being 'cast aside' like he was
Idaho Murder Case: Bryan Kohberger Gives New Details About His Alibi
Meta releases AI model to enhance Metaverse experience
Why Cheryl Burke Says Being a Breadwinner Put Strain on Matthew Lawrence Marriage
Pennsylvania House Dems propose new expulsion rules after remote voting by lawmaker facing a warrant
Man who lost son in Robb Elementary shooting criticizes Uvalde shirt sold at Walmart; store issues apology