Current:Home > InvestCalifornia voters lose a shot at checking state and local tax hikes at the polls -WealthEngine
California voters lose a shot at checking state and local tax hikes at the polls
View
Date:2025-04-19 16:21:22
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — The California Supreme Court on Thursday removed a measure from the November ballot that would have made it harder to raise taxes, siding with Gov. Gavin Newsom and his Democratic allies in the state Legislature.
The measure would have required voter approval for tax increases passed by the state Legislature. It also would have raised the threshold required for voter approval of certain local government tax increases to a two-thirds vote at the polls. Currently those tax increases can take affect if a simple majority of voters approve.
The measure would have applied retroactively to most tax increases approved since Jan. 1, 2022. Local governments warned that would mean they could have lost billions of dollars in revenue that had previously been approved by voters.
Newsom has opposed many tax increases during his time in office. But he sued to block this measure, saying it would harm local governments and take away the Legislature’s ability to raise taxes.
Supporters of the ballot measure argued that California has become too expensive and voters need more control over taxes. In a unanimous decision, the court ruled the measure could not be enacted by ballot initiative because it “would substantially alter our basic plan of government.” Justice Goodwin Liu wrote the opinion. “The Supreme Court’s decision to take this dangerous initiative off the ballot avoids a host of catastrophic impacts, protecting billions of dollars for schools, access to reproductive health care, gun safety laws that keep students safe in classrooms, and paid family leave,” said Jonathan Underland, spokesperson for the campaign that opposed the initiative. Removing a qualified measure from the ballot before an election is rare in California, but not unprecedented. The court wrote it was necessary in this case to review the initiative because it would have potentially voided tax increases put in place after Jan. 1, 2022. That may have deprived government of some funding lawmakers were counting on.
veryGood! (38)
Related
- IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
- Facebook whistleblower Francis Haugen: No accountability for privacy features implemented to protect young people
- Can Trump still become president if he's convicted of a crime or found liable in a civil case?
- Clean Energy Investment ‘Bank’ Has Bipartisan Support, But No Money
- Rylee Arnold Shares a Long
- Developer Pulls Plug on Wisconsin Wind Farm Over Policy Uncertainty
- 9 diseases that keep epidemiologists up at night
- A baby spent 36 days at an in-network hospital. Why did her parents get a huge bill?
- The company planning a successor to Concorde makes its first supersonic test
- Weapons expert Hannah Gutierrez-Reed accused of being likely hungover on set of Alec Baldwin movie Rust before shooting
Ranking
- DeepSeek: Did a little known Chinese startup cause a 'Sputnik moment' for AI?
- How will Trump's lawyers handle his federal indictment? Legal experts predict these strategies will be key
- Clean Energy Investment ‘Bank’ Has Bipartisan Support, But No Money
- Harry Jowsey Reacts to Ex Francesca Farago's Engagement to Jesse Sullivan
- Former longtime South Carolina congressman John Spratt dies at 82
- U.S. Army soldier Cole Bridges pleads guilty to attempting to help ISIS murder U.S. troops
- A Surge of Climate Lawsuits Targets Human Rights, Damage from Fossil Fuels
- Don't let the cold weather ruin your workout
Recommendation
Global Warming Set the Stage for Los Angeles Fires
Standing Rock Leaders Tell Dakota Pipeline Protesters to Leave Protest Camp
U.S. Military Report Warns Climate Change Threatens Key Bases
Trump indictment timeline: What's next for the federal documents case?
Trump suggestion that Egypt, Jordan absorb Palestinians from Gaza draws rejections, confusion
This Amazingly Flattering Halter Dress From Amazon Won Over 10,600+ Reviewers
At Davos, the Greta-Donald Dust-Up Was Hardly a Fair Fight
A Trump-appointed Texas judge could force a major abortion pill off the market